Stardusk – Moral Relativist & Narcissist

Stardusk has decided to create a video in three parts (over half an hour) wherein he rants like a fool about natural rights and rational self-interest, trying to come across as someone with a modicum of understanding when it comes to philosophy. I will save people some time by supplying part three, where he summarises the whole video in ten minutes (why didn’t he do that in the first place? Most likely since he needs to embellish his arguments with so much tripe that you cannot see how weak they are). What he does is reveal (finally) where he stands philosophically – he is a Hobbesian style pessimist that denies any objective existence of morality, arguing that morality is a construct defined by agreement of the collective, and that natural rights are fictional. So finally we have an unwitting admittance on his part regarding his philosophical nihilism and collectivism.

Barbarrossaa Responds to Someone Irrelevant

In spite of my irrelevance in Barbarossaa’s eyes (which is no doubt a lie considering that you would never respond to someone that is as irrelevant as he suggests) he uploaded a video response to my recent post, “Face it, MGTOW is a Cult”. Barbarossaa could barely contain his rage, calling me all manner of names while he desperately attempted to attack my character, and create as many straw-men as possible, anything but respond to the philosophical content of what I wrote, such as class consciousness, pessimism, and the groupthink mentality that now dominates MGTOW circles. Barbie’s video was so devoid of substance that I am not going to waste my time responding any more than is required.

Face it, MGTOW is a Cult

There is nothing of greater importance in a just world than holding oneself to the same standards as one expects from others. In the case of the MRM the hypocrisy is rife in this sense. They understand the dangerous generalisations that come with feminist philosophy regarding male nature, but are far less inclined to see it right under their noses in the case of a cult within the MRM, known as Men Going Their Own Way, shortened to the acronym MGTOW.

North Korea – a Fascist State?

The UK TV show ‘Panorama’, part of the BBC Network’s programme schedule, aired a programme on the 15^th April 2013 called Panorama: North Korea Undercover. In the programme journalist John Sweeney went undercover as a London School of Economics history professor, along with a party of students. In reality he was there to capture the degradation and authoritarianism of the Communist regime. No stranger to controversy, having also been involved in a programme exposing scientology, he has also sparked a great deal of controversy once more with this programme, this time due to the potential threat he put the students under who travelled to North Korea with him, after the North Korean government threatened to expose the details of the students that travelled with John Sweeney if the programme is aired.

What the Cyprus Bailout Reveals

To say the recent Cyprus bailout reveals anything is a bit of a misnomer. For those with their fingers on the pulse of the geopolitical landscape there’s no epiphany here. The fact that the Cypriot bailout almost became an attempt to inflict all bank depositors with a one off 6.75% levy, for funds under 100,000 euros, sends a very clear message; Eurocrats are determined to keep their Ponzi scheme afloat at any cost - if people take it lying down. While the 6.75% haircut has been abandoned on funds below 100,000 euros, those above 100,000 euros haven’t been so fortunate. In typical socialist fashion larger depositors were always in line to lose at least 9.9%. Now this could rise to 40%. As usual under collectivism the opportunity to take from those that have amassed moderate funds has been exploited, and no attempt whatsoever has been made to distinguish between those that might have worked for a lifetime to accumulate finances. Even business accounts holding funds for clients, or cash flow prior to taxation, have been targeted.

What Happened to MRA+?

A year ago I had a certain idea. I was beginning to notice that many of the problems discussed in men’s rights circles were easy to avoid, while the type of women that exploit their cultural privilege were not as unavoidable as some would suggest. After some reflection I began to come up with a concept to spot and avoid dysfunctional women, while at the same time showing men how to spot women with values that make them desirable for long-term relationships. Such values include loyalty, honesty, aspirations to start a family, and a rejection of female entitlement that has become all too common in the present culture. What these values really amount to is a woman of virtue; someone that understands how many of the qualities she’s led to believe are important today are not only impractical, but diminish honourable character.

Now Even Angry Harry is Wrong

This is not the post I originally had in mind to write, but frankly, right now I’m angry, which is very apt, because the person I am going to support is Angry Harry, someone that even Paul Elam has previously called the father of men’s rights. It’s no secret to many that I’ve had my issues with members of the Men’s Movement, but to now see that even a prominent individual like Angry Harry is coming under fire when pointing out the shortcomings of what A Voice for Men now considers acceptable editorial policy, shows that it’s growing impossible to deny that the Men’s Movement has reached a schism.

Piers Morgan Vs Alex Jones

Even across the pond in the UK Alex Jones caught the mainstream media’s attention when Piers Morgan had him on his show to discuss gun control. What ensued wasn’t really much of a discussion, but more of a confrontation. Many pro-gun advocates feel that Alex Jones did more harm than good by failing to remain composed. Here’s a video of the segment: