27 November 2013

Movember is Sexist!

Observe how the perpetual ally of feminists, the 'transgendered' person, attacks Movember because it's "sexist, racist, transphobic, and misinformed", partly because it involves moustaches that transgendered people and women cannot grow. It's also classist, apparently. Unsurprisingly all these accusations come right out of the book of critical theory, a la cultural Marxism.

How many times, and how many ways, do people have to explain that cultural Marxists are not only psychologically damaged, but nothing but a product of a leftist machine that runs down men on a constant basis? Ironically, we should examine how transgender has never been proven to exist as a biological phenomenon, since there is no falsifiable evidence for it, and that in fact there is a growing scientific backlash that proves what most rational people would believe; that transgender is a mental condition, not a biological phenomenon.

But no, this isn't what's examined in this disgustingly divisive piece. Instead we have to hear about why prostate cancer is not a serious problem, and how white "cis" men don't suffer with it much, and therefore Movember is about privilege and sexism. All this is the typical garbage that cultural Marxists inflict upon people, agitating wherever they go, in the spirit of Marxist hatred. It never occurs to these fools that awareness reduces fatalities, let alone that there is absolutely zero harm with an occasion that notices male ailments, for once. It's not as though breast cancer awareness month is not everywhere we go in October, even the WWE, with pink on the ring ropes.

Why it is acceptable for Marxists to behave with such hostility, while it isn't for Nazis and fascists, the most trendy label to give to those that oppose politically correct dogma, is a mystery to me. The sooner we send Marxism, communism and socialism into the dustbin of history, where it belongs, the better. In the meantime, might I suggest we make Movember a 365 day event, just to piss these imbeciles off.

10 comments:

  1. I only made it about halfway through that article until I just gave up.

    I can appreciate the frustration that came through in your commentary above.

    Critical theory be dammed!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hear, hear. This was a new approach to this site. I haven't got the time for in-depth articles on a regular basis. So I thought I'd have a rant here, since a post like this is a little long for Facebook.

      Delete
  2. The concepts of sexism and trangender have no practical validity, calling anything sexist is exactly equivalent to saying it's an offence against god, that is: it's meaningless without reference to an idealogical framework. If you don't subscribe to the particular ideology the person using the word is referencing (they're not always the same one) then you can tell 'em, 'There's no such thing as sexism' with same absolute assurance of the atheist for whom god doesn't exist.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This BBC R4 show http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01rbrtd was all about a clash between feminists and Transexuals. Some of the stuff about prisons shocked me. i.e. to change sex legally you ONLY need to have a psychiatrist say that you are the new sex and from then on the law treats you like you are the new sex. So basically there are men with wigs (and penises) in women's prisons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The idea that transsexuality exists at all is littered with zero falsifiable evidence. It's all conjecture defined by pseudo-intellectual "expertise", as leftists all prefer in their regimes.

      Radical feminists are not all accepting of transsexuals because they believe that there is no such thing as sex in the human brain. Transsexuals contradict that. Others, like Sex+ feminists however, are more inclined to ignore that contradiction of feminist theory.

      Delete
  4. From the original post:

    "...we should examine how transgender has never been proven to exist as a biological phenomenon, since there is no falsifiable evidence for it, and that in fact there is a growing scientific backlash that proves what most rational people would believe; that transgender is a mental condition, not a biological phenomenon."


    The medical profession said the same about homosexuality until about forty years ago (prior to which, it was classed in the DSM as a psychiatric disorder). Then came the long march through the institutions. Now anyone who dares to argue that homosexuality is pathological and can be successfully treated is considered a deadly fringe wacko and (most importantly of all) a HATER. Particularly if he's a white, middle-class, jewish male conservative Christian (which one imagines in the Left's eyes constitutes the double trifecta of personified evil).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not sure it matters if homosexuals can be "treated" or not. What's important is that they aren't hurting anyone, or agitating for political power through lies and conjecture.

      Delete
    2. Do you think this is the case? That "the LGBT community" is basically benign?

      I once thought so. Can't say I'm so sure, now...

      Delete
    3. There is not one feminist theory. In fact there is not one feminism but many.

      Neurobiology would have great problems with your claim that is for sure Mr E. Both in the case of sexual variance and gender identity variance. So no, modern science does not support your claim at all. Below is a video, it contains a part of a lecture by renown neuroscientist Robert Saplosky, he talks about transsexualism and neurobiology watch and learn. He also in the same lecture but not in that video talk about diffrence beetwen sexual orientation variance. We where born this way, science shows it , history shows it, the animal kingdom shows it.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3C4ZJ7HyuE

      Delete
    4. No, feminism is a monolithic ideological entity, with a few minor disagreements used to suggest they are not pulling in the same direction - it's a ruse because all leftists fight among one another once they begin to dominate, as history shows.

      The video is not evidence of anything at all - I've seen it before, and consider it to be laughable. The guy has the gall to suggest that phantom limb syndrome proves that transsexuality is real. That's pure conjecture considering that many people want to go back to their original sex after a sex change operation, and many people who lose limbs don't experience phantom limb syndrome at all.

      This guy is just another feminist,quoting Simone de Beauvoir of all people for evidence of his position. Beauvoir's theories have been proven utterly flawed by modern science. Transsexuality is a myth and sex is predominantly a binary condition. Here is video that exposes the John Money nonsense behind transsexuality:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVMlfhHuYoc

      And no Jasmine, you haven't fooled me into believing you are someone else. Don't bother posting again.

      Delete